The Seven Principles of Public Life

THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC LIFE

(as set out by the Nolan Committee)

Selflessness

Holders of public office should take decisions solely in terms of public interest.  They should not do so in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family or their friends.

Integrity

Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might influence them in the performance of their official duties.

Objectivity

In carrying out public business, including making public appointments, awarding contracts, or recommending individuals for rewards and benefits, holders of public office should make choices on merit.

Accountability

Holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions to the public and must subject themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office.

Openness

Holders of public office should be as open as possible about all decisions and actions that they take.  They should give reasons for their decisions and restrict information only when the wider public interest clearly demands it.

Honesty

Holders of public office have a duty to declare any private interests relating to their public duties and to take steps to resolve any conflicts arising in a way that protects public interest.

Leadership

Holders of public office should promote and support these principles by leadership and example.

Posted in Uncategorized

Crimes against disabled people

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/if-its-crime-against-people-with-disabilities-we-dont-care-a6966776.html

Posted in Uncategorized

GREAT Britain in the 21st Century

It is a well known fact that there is a surfeit of swear words in the English language; so rich is our verbal vulgarity that even speakers of foreign languages frequently swear in English. Yet somehow even with these excesses available to me, there isn’t a word in my vocabulary to adequately describe my contempt for the British government.

Screen Shot 2016-03-30 at 21.44.47

Posted in Uncategorized

Simple Rules For Life

1. Don’t judge people.
2. Don’t judge yourself.
3. Don’t give any shit.
4. Don’t take any shit.
5. Don’t want stuff.
6. Learn to say fuck off.
7. Pay it forward.
8. Be grateful every day.
9. Be kind.
10. Question everything.

After posting this on Facebook, it occurred to me that 9 should be:

Be excellent to each other.

My friend Susan suggested:

11. Share what you have …advice, yourself and everything you achieve

Another friend, Jane, suggested:

11. Accept your failures and learn from them.

I like Charlie Chaplin’s version:

“Failure is unimportant. It takes courage to make a fool of yourself.”

Posted in Uncategorized

LOVE this TED Talk

Posted in Uncategorized

60% income tax is a BAD idea

Bloody hell it’s been more than a year since my last blog post!  I’ve actually started a few and then given up and just let them become way out of date… And in fact I’ve just ditched 3 unfinished, unpublished posts.  So what’s prompted me to blog today?  The Green Party’s announcement of a 60% income tax rate. I’m interested in the Greens and in the left generally, but I think a 60% income rate tax is wrong and counter-productive.

I appreciate that our public services are desperate for funding, but to me the tax that needs reform is corporation tax, specifically closing the off-shoring loopholes. Corporation tax is a profit tax not an income tax. What that means is a tax on what is made after all costs have been deducted, rather than on gross earnings. The thing with income tax is, I don’t care who you are, paying 60% income tax is staggeringly unfair and a huge disincentive to work. I think tax rates are about right, though a 50% supertax for those earning mega-money eg over £1,000,000 could be considered and VAT should definitely be cut to 15%.

The thing is, yes our economy is grossly unbalanced, but excessively punitive individual taxation is not the solution. I do think avoidance and evasion need to be tackled, the “tax gap” is a disgrace, it runs at anywhere between £35BILLION (HMRC’s number) and £120BILLION (Tax Justice Network’s estimate) per year. The cost of the top tax cut from 50% to 45% in 2010 is estimated to be £100MILLION per year, so as you can see it’s “nibbling at the edge” of the problem rather than solving it.  Clamp down on the bigger problem and close the tax gap. Increase corporation tax to 28% or even 30% and CRUCIALLY make big companies pay all of their staff a living wage (what is a big company? Can’t tell you in financial terms, but examples would be Asda, Shell, BT etc).

How would this work? And why would it work?  Look at some of these multinational corporations, the make billions of pounds of profit every year, but many of their workers are on below subsistence wages (ie the minimum wage), this means that they literally can’t afford to work, so the government makes up the shortfall by way of tax credits – ie Child Tax Credit or Working Tax Credit.  But what *they* don’t tell you is that tax credits are essentially propping up poverty wages, they allow corporations to get away with paying poverty wages. They are a subsidy for (big) business.   Apparently supermarket workers claim £11BILLION in benefits every year!

Look I’ve run my own business, I know how difficult it can be to pay decent wages for your staff, but I’m not talking about small companies here – I’m talking about multi-national corporations where the directors are being paid mega-bucks and the shareholders get a huge dividend every year.

Dividends are profit share, but often that profit is derived from “exploiting” the workers, this exploitation is masked by government intervention by way of tax credits.  So is it real profit? Why not make all companies pay all of their workers a decent wage BEFORE they can be considered in profit?  How would you do this? You could impose a punitive profit tax of say 75% on any listed company that doesn’t pay its workers a living wage.  And if a company can’t afford all of its costs (including the aforementioned living wage for all of its employees) then it isn’t profitable at all, it’s merely exploitative – or worse, a lifestyle business.  Tax Credits and other in work benefits are a huge drain on the public pocket, but without exploitative businesses the cost could be massively reduced. Plus the extra income would create more spending and boost the economy that way.

I have lots of other ideas that I think would benefit the public purse, I might publish them before the election. If I can be arsed.

Posted in Uncategorized

The REAL suck on the taxpayers’ tit

I’m beginning to think London is the big SUCK on the taxpayers’ tit – it’s not us feckless people up north who cost the most.  A quick glance at some of government’s tables and articles in the press show that:

  • The North East has received £86.22 per head in arts lottery funding since 1995, while Londoners received £165.
  • £21.33 per head is spent on arts’ funding in London compared to £5.59 per head for the rest of the country
  • 85% of the highways budget is spent in London and the SE.
  • £2,700 is spent per person in London on public transport subsidies compared with £5 per head in the north-east.

We don’t even have a Film Hub up here.

And EVEN if we oop Norf do take more health spending (which is open to debate) – remember our life expectancy is 10 years less than in London and the SE, so that’s 10 years less of state pensions!

We may like to think that the wealth is created in London too – but the North East is regularly the only region with a balance of trade surplus!  So I say fuck you London, fuck you Tories, I think we would manage without you.

For more information read the government’s OWN analysis.

Posted in Uncategorized